Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
We gave away our minimum number of departures out of Narita. We replaced it with more "iron clad" language (like the iron clad language we just gave up) to have a minimum level of Pacific flying. That level being 20% LESS than what we were currently flying. That's a fact.
Actually, the protected amount of Pacific flying is 85% of what was being operated at the time this deal was struck, not 80%. Similarly, the original requirement for operate 316 NRT slots was 80% of the number being operated by NWA at that time.
Just as factual is the concept that the minimum amount of flying required for Delta to codeshare beyond NRT rose from an average of 116,400 to a minimum of 182,750 annual block hours. In other words, this trade increased the protected number of block hours by over 55%.
Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
DALPA has done no such thing that I've read. If I'm wrong, please post the language that makes it clear DALPA intends to file a grievance.
I've not seen it in writing, but I've certainly heard it stated over and over again at roadshows and PUB events. Have you heard or seen in writing that DALPA intends NOT to file a grievance?
Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
They have indeed made it worse. We're pulling down Europe flying during the cure period.
Are you sure about that? I've heard that we're not growing Europe as much as we had planned, but not that we're shrinking there. And what are AF/KL/AZ doing in the meantime. Their growth or shrinkage from Europe would also affect the balance of flying, right?