Yes, the ones who can afford to sacrifice because they've enjoyed $240K plus for many years. The point is, many have already sacrificed, and will continue to do so for many years in lost wages and the lost opportunity costs, just based on the dynamics of the past five years and the projections going forward. Shouldn't those who are in the best position to make sacrifices and can best afford to do so be the ones who actually make the sacrifice, rather than those with less economic means?