Originally Posted by
fisherman
The PSA apologists are defending their YES vote based on the SAP/critical pay, but the SAP/critical pay were already in the contract? The PSA apologists are being very misleading.
No but had the company asked for SAP for new aircraft none of you loud mouths would say a word. However that was left untouched and the pilots there thought the benefit of a larger fleet and career progression in conjunction with keeping such a valuable tool was worth a 12/4 cap and guaranteed pay raises for 10 years......
But hey they all should apologize right? They have a good contract for a regional, growth, and movement. Sounds awful.