Originally Posted by
SpecialTracking
I don't need to know you to realize a divisive post via revisionist history. You might wear your pin, but your post says otherwise. As section 6 openers approach, what's more important?
The next contract will be interesting. Many of the "no" voters were not voting on the merits of the contract, but trying to delay to squeeze out some more Captain bids. Many of the "yes" voters were not voting on the merits of the contract, but voting to stop the windfall.
We will see if this next contract actually passes on its merits and not because of politics.