Originally Posted by
DLax85
It's been a while, but unfortunately Disputed Pairings are back in the 757 MEM Bidpack as we enter Peak.
Please put Safety First, and support your PSIT & SIG:
Straight from the SIG Notes:
#103 / 10NOV
#105 / 17NOV
#120 / 10, 17 NOV
#124 / 24NOV
#302 / 04, 05, 06, 11, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26 NOV
#346 / 10, 17 NOV
BFM-QRO, pairing 302, is a previously disputed pairing that has reappeared in November. We are continuing to dispute this pairing design based on risks associated with operating two legs critical into a high CFIT/minimal ATC international
destination.
BTV-SYR-EWR-FLL, disputed pairings 103/105/120/124/346 contain an 11+01 layover before an 11+18 3 leg night duty period
Thanks,
In Safety...and Unity,
DLax
I understand how the dispute process works - what I don't understand is why this sequence was OK for SEP - OCT but is now disputed for NOV. Plus the layover is always shorter due to waiting in SYR for MEM flight to come through and the ramp is really slow!