Originally Posted by
Loon
Your definition of "the truth" is hetman telling us that he can't talk about what happened in meetings with RAH big wigs? First of all, no one asked him to. This is a prime example of how the 357 "leaders" become engrossed with themselves; thinking that they are heading a major movement in labor negotiations. This is how the abuse and corruption starts: with ego-maniacs like hetman. These people are the poster children for having "delusions of grandeur".
This makes them feel justified in stealing from the dues payers. They are no different from corrupt politicians. They are scum.
Personal attack? That is a logical fallacy. I would have expected better from you. Or maybe not.
Obfuscation? Another logical fallacy. The issue is not your opinion of the union leadership; it is the regard in which management holds labor. Your efforts to deflect that discussuion are hereby noted.
I am not of the union leadership. Never was with the 357. I hung my butt way, way out back in the 747 days trying to reform the RAH representation. I testiified against GS at the hearings in Houston when the 747 was thrown out. In a nutshell, your fallacious accusations, at least those directed at me personally, could not be further from the truth.
So despite the smelly smokescreen you tried to lay down, despite your attempted personal attack and despite your attempt to obfuscate first hand knowledge, new hire candidates need to be aware of the esteem in which their labor is held.