Originally Posted by
Joepilot84
He didn't have to pay the contract, did he? Most companies don't deliver on their promises, and if they do, then there is no reason to break contract. The fact is that in the majority of cases, companies fail to collect on these agreements.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
You obviously have an unflappable preconceived notion on this issue. He did pay part of the contract (if there ever was a true contract) by working for Flexjet as long as he did. It was his duty under the alleged terms to remain employed for a certain period of time. Therefore, every day he was employed he was fulfilling a portion of his contractual obligation. Why do think they only sued for a portion of the outstanding balance?