Originally Posted by
PurpleTurtle
Of course it is. It was a cut and paste quote, and the content is much more relevant than the spelling.
In that case, how would the misspelling of the arbitrators name validate the content ?
It would seem to bring more question to the content (his assessment and position), then validation. I mean, if he can't even master the basics of the arbitrators name, how valid could his assessment be of the validity of the award itself ?
Just a thought.