Originally Posted by
gloopy
Just to play MBA's advocate, is there any funny way they can move the cups around to hide the profit to avoid that? Or simply not make it as a profit (per say) in the first place? I'm against reducing profit sharing anyway, but I really don't envision any scenario where they will pay the worker bees 54% over W-2.
There are many ways to shift profits around in shell companies. The problem Delta holdings has, is they are making so much damn money, it would be impossible to play those games.