Originally Posted by
full of luv
I happened upon the interview live and stopped and watched. What I found interesting is that Mr. Smisek really had no message. The CAL/UAL stuff was really the hosts of the show repeatedly asking to the point where Smisek was uncomfortable with the accusations against LUAL.
I haven't watched a bunch of CNBC interviews but I would have though Smisek would have had more of a message to sort of direct the discussion vice just sitting there receiving jabs about how bad his airline was in the past.
QED. The hollow suit who has never really worked in this industry spewing generalities just to get his ego stroked on live TV.