Evaluate it ? I can't even understand it.

You clam to not be "anti-union", but that flies in the face of virtually everything you say and advocate. You then on one hand demand we take the better deal that Parker's offer supposedly is then say here that unions should not accept anything not in writing and get what they negotiate. All I've seen of Parker's offer is some meaningless bullet points and NOTHING in writing and what I have seen is worthless by even more then that litmus. What I DO see is a union attempting to "negotiate". You then criticize me (or other worthless "unionists" ) for not living up to agreements, but then criticize the willingness to do that by accepting the MOU JCBA provisions.

I see so many contradictions, I can't begin to evaluate any of your claims. It's simply all over the map for me.