Originally Posted by
PurpleTurtle
The protocol agreement has already set the course. The participants won't be be able to steer outside of that but the lawyers will make folks feel good and get paid well to do so.
Well that's not entirely true. There can be a valid argument made that the protocol agreement was drafted in such a way the it harms one group or rather a class of participants thus should be nullified. Now I am in no way saying that will be the approach but I would not at all be surprised if it were.
WD at AWA