Originally Posted by
AxlF16
Can we include this in our arguments in the SLI hearing when the next merger occurs?
I also heard them citing a long list of awards to demonstrate just how great they were... So -- what is the difference between that list of past awards and the ones that we're getting now???
No we can't use them in the next SLI argument. Because "travel awards" is not one of the mandatory factors. We should stick with the pre-defined union policies for merging to make our next SLI case.
Unless none of these mandatory ones are in our favor, then we should argue things like "travel awards" and other superfluous factors.