Originally Posted by
Wiskey Driver
Well that's not entirely true. There can be a valid argument made that the protocol agreement was drafted in such a way the it harms one group or rather a class of participants thus should be nullified. Now I am in no way saying that will be the approach but I would not at all be surprised if it were.
WD at AWA
Ok.
Consider this.. The PA is presently a governing document. AOL has acknowledged as much in that they have submitted to it and made application for a west merger committee pursuant to the PA... In that they submit to the PA, they (all of us) will be required to follow all of it.
If AOL intends to repudiate the PA, when are they going to do so? And if they should ever be successful in invalidating the PA (by who's authority?) then what governing document will replace the PA (and again by whose authority will a new PA be established?). And how soon is AOL going to make all this happen, seeing that they haven't even started to do so?