Old 12-09-2014 | 08:35 AM
  #422  
Moonwolf's Avatar
Moonwolf
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 21
From: Sleeping
Default

Originally Posted by csh405
I'm sorry but I fail to see how "burning it down" and indirectly sending 40 planes to another carrier, dropping upgrade times, enticing fos to make MORE lateral moves to chase an upgrade, increasing the whipsaw, eliminating a relatively well paid regional and leaving more lower paid ones to flight for the scraps, and giving up a guaranteed job at a legacy is preserving the industry and your future careers. In my eyes this would have the opposite effect.
I fail to understand what point you are trying to make?

If Eagle votes yes, they are only guaranteed 40 airplanes correct?? So what is the incentive to vote yes? you already have 220some airplanes.
That would already put a large majority of pilots on the street.
Reply