TP;
Luckily in Asia I learned first to stop asking why. I now apply that to my old job. I can't change it, and asking "why" makes my head hurt.

Awesome post, but I would add something from a slightly different perspective:

ALPA has been on the wrong side of many strategic debacles since I joined the industry. I don't believe they do it to protect a certain percentage of pilots. ALPA is a business, pure and simple. They are trying to maintain control of the pilot market, and their revenue stream.

Currently, and very short term, I am pulling on the same end of the rope as ALPA as it benefits me. Long term, ALPA is in it only for itself. If NAI gets approval, ALPA will lead the charge to try to unionize them and get their 2% tribute.

There will be more airplanes, and more pilots. I am one of the latter for 3-10 more years. I could care less what brand is painted on the tail. I could care even less if I get 2% deducted from my paycheck for a private equity group in Herndon, VA.

The only "threat" from outside is a long term existential threat to ALPA's control and revenue. There will be more jobs in 5 years than there are now.

Change is coming. Again. I hope to see it delayed as the current situation is pretty good for major airlines in the US. ALPA will have no affect on this no matter how much ALPA PAC money they collect.

Now, sit back, and read what the ALPA Nazi's on this forum will post as I am now the devil, or worse, a scab.