View Single Post
Old 12-16-2014 | 10:31 PM
  #91  
Packrat
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Block representation basically disenfranchised one group of pilots from each of the small bases. Before block representation each base had a voting Captain rep and a voting F/O rep.

After block representation, one of those small base voters disappeared.

The funny thing is, SEA always had the hammer. It was called "Roll Call". In effect, any measure could be voted by the reps, each having the number of votes that matched the members they represented. SEA, with over 900 members, could control any issue.

Block representation or not, SEA always was the 900 lb. gorilla. Before block representation there was always a gentleman's agreement that each LEC rep carried equal weight in all discussions. Votes were based on the majority of 6 voters with the MEC Chairman casting the deciding vote only if there was a tie.

Block representation is a very valid system in a pilot group with thousands of members. When it was adopted by the AS MEC, the only group using block representation was FedEx. There was a rumor that ALPA National really wanted to extend block representation to a passenger airline, but the large MECs weren't interested.

Alaska MEC Chairmen have historically closely supported the agenda of ALPA National. It is not a surprise, therefore, that block representation was adopted by the AS MEC without much of a fight.

If anyone wants a detailed description of how the system came to be at Alaska, PM me and I'll give you a point of contact who can give you the details.
Reply