Originally Posted by
sailingfun
I have asked this question several times here and never been given a answer. Why on earth would our reps and negotiating committee have some sort of plan to limit contractual gains? Why would they want to pay themselves less and work more?
My opinion is that some sort of modified "Stockholm Syndrome" or "Kool-Aid" scenario occurs. The line between management and union fades creating a cohesive relationship thus mildly diluting contractual gains while fortifying management goals. (after all dont most union guys end up in management positions?)
TEN