View Single Post
Old 01-12-2015 | 08:48 AM
  #3196  
sailingfun
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
I agree. I think there is tremendous value to the company in inking the waters with a million issues at the same time, and this is one of the biggest ways for them to move the ball around the cups while we think we are watching.

I'm sure if this is attempted, it will be sold as either neutral or a net gain. But if that is the case, where is the harm in separating it out?

If the company moves to change it, they will only be doing so because it makes financial sense for them. IOW it will save them money. IOW it will not be a neutral ledger move. We will give up more than we get.

Theoretically if there is no profits and we could somehow "lock it in" the payrates that would be great. However if we go from 5-10B in projected annual profits to annual losses, just how long does anyone think we will keep our new raise plus monetized profit sharing in the first place?

Leave it alone until after C15 and make it a seperate issue.
The interesting thing is the company has not even hinted at changing profit sharing. This forum is the source for the rumors. If anything the company has stated they believe in profit sharing.
Reply