Originally Posted by
AB YZS
We would not give up 1.8 billion if we vote NO. Why are people saying this? Parity with no concessions is what we should compare the current POS offer with.
Why do you believe:
1. That we do NOT lose value in arbitration? Do you really believe we'll equal the economic value of the TA with sticking to the MTA? If so, how?
2. That we get "parity" in 2016. Parity with whom? Does the MTA call for parity? Or simply industry comparable?
I'll add that reading you saying this over and over again leads me to believe that you're not thinking with facts, that you suck at math, that you are leaning heavily on "what ifs" to come true, or some combination thereof.