Stating the obvious...
In Economic terms, Technology benefits capital by increasing efficiency and decreasing labor.
The company invested on technology to save $, by decreasing our labor cost.
Has it been established that it can, and will, be forced upon us to use the already purchased technology? If so, there is no going back to classroom.
What will the company gain by making us physically present at our domicile for training, other than a scare tactic for leverage?
While the company's monetary gains are substantial, what are we gaining in return?
Do we want to make the point that financial gains should be partially shared?
OUR company has been exceptionally profitable, and is forecasted to continue to be.
Have we reaped any benefits from those gains?
It may be defeatist to expect to maintain the current benefits associated with training scheduling.
Isn't it speculative to predict what may, or may not, be forced upon us, if we vote NO.
Are we gaining anything substantial with a YES vote?
Would this be an appropriate time for NK management to show their commitment to "good faith negotiations" as a prelude to this summer?