Originally Posted by
JoeyMeatballs
It appears not..........there is no reason for them too......
I'm currently inclined to vote yes, get my 10hrs, do the training on a horrid 27hr DTW layover and look to perhaps clean up the language or "get the cost savings back" come contract time......
Kind of, "lose the battle to win the war" type of thing. If the conflicts are going away, voting no to vote no really won't accomplish anything. The MEC sending this out without restoring the two days means it's prob alt not going to happen. It should have been included in the LOA
You guys can flame away but I just don't see how voting no on this LOA is going to do anything but inconvenience ourselves?
Am I way off target?
I don't think you're way off target. I don't think the conflicts would disappear if you vote no. There won't be deadheads, but you'll still burn two duty days sitting in base on an iPad doing ground school. Given how many of our lines are at minimum days off due to unproductive trips and/or abound with 6 day work blocks, something will need to drop. That's why they signed the LOA.