Originally Posted by Thunderpig

This isn't meant to be a poke in the eye or a snarky question:

Is it going to look negatively on the union that they were (allegedly) unwilling to meet in DC since the mediator was apparently unable to travel due to funds and (allegedly) the company offered to meet the union there?

Caveat: this was a topic of conversation between a couple of people and I was curious who was telling the truth.