Originally Posted by
Jughead135
At what point does it become more economical (for the company) to raise pay rates to the point where folks stick around, versus a steady departure rate (i.e., training costs walking out the door)?
We are so far below the market that attrition costs the company less than a pay raise would cost.
Let's say our pilot payroll is in the neighborhood of $80 million a year. If we received an across-the-board 20% raise, the cost to the company would be $16 million. (This still leaves us well short of the industry average for flying an Airbus, btw)
If we say it costs $25k to train up a new pilot, the break-even point on attrition is roughly 640 pilots per year or a little more than 50 per month.
Of course these numbers are only my wild guesses, but run whatever numbers you believe to be true and I bet you come to the same conclusion. An attrition rate of less than 5 per month doesn't break the squelch.
I think the only way we'll see a raise to stem attrition is when staffing levels start leading to sufficiently-expensive operational problems. Start canceling even one flight a day at a cost of $50k per flight and you're quickly talking real money to an airline the size of Frontier.
Just my humble opinion.