Originally Posted by
HappyToBeHere
It is a good summary of US involvement but leaves out the contributions and involvement of many other countries but not sure what your point is.
My wife is a lawyer so I know when to recognize I am being led into a trap just come out and say it.
Ha! Now that's funny. You know your wife well. Ok. I'll cut to the chase.
Why all the crap talk (not a legal term) about Obama? Why the questioning of what side he's on? Why the claims that he's weak, and/or won't retaliate? Why the suggestion that him not naming the enemy is more important than the bombs we've been dropping on them for the past 7 months?
He's even using an outdated congressional authorization as a basis for doing what he's doing and could have waited for Congress to screw it up before launching the attacks. (A few weeks ago, in the SOTU, he asked for applicable authorization.) So, he's basically fighting an unconstitutional war. But, you don't know what side he's on.
It makes no sense.
Can you explain?
PS: Good recognition. Your wife taught you well.
