Originally Posted by
GunshipGuy
But back to the hypothetical. If the PAC supported a communist, would you donate knowing you're efforts supported that candidate/incumbent?
If not, then that's your limit and a line you won't cross. For me, it's not as flexible. If you're still willing to donate even if they support a communist then your principals are different from mine and I just can't bring myself to understanding yours, and you not understanding mine.
At the risk of sounding like a smart a$$ (or Bill Clinton), I guess it would depend on your definition of a communist.
Are you using the term to generalize the left? Only those on the left you strongly disagree with?
As I said above, I view it as purchasing access. Without access we will get steamrolled. It is repulsive, but it is the way the game is rigged.
I want to be clear though. I 100% understand where you are coming from and support your right to hold the line on your beliefs. I just happen to view it as more grey than black & white. I don't think its possible to get anything done in Washington unless one is willing to flex, at least a little bit, and work with those that we may disagree with - especially if they hold the hammer (and sickle
). IMO this is DC is so f-ed up. Everyone is too entrenched and views any opposition as the enemy. YMMV.
-LeineLodge, the Red
