Originally Posted by
IAV84DAL
Your accusation has been disproven shoe. Accept it. And the subsequent attempt at hysterical metaphor as an assertion that Profit Sharing is contractually guaranteed suggests you are either lying or just woefully misinformed.
You owe me an apology.
I don't know how else to put it to you. I have shown the contractual language that proves Profit Sharing is part of SWAPA's negotiated compensation package. It can not be removed without a replacement. They can call that replacement compensation "double secret extra special pay" for all I care, but the fact remains that Profit Sharing is a contractually mandated compensation that cannot be removed without a replacement. Which portion of that fact do you not understand?