Originally Posted by
IAV84DAL
Really? Sarcasm? I've laid out my "manifesto" in broad strokes. Yes, I'd like to see C2K restored as a starter toward "Restoring the Profession". If we're in fact "Takin' it Back" it means presenting a pay scale that demands recognition of our skillset. PS is not part of that recognition. I believe that offering PS as a trade is a losing strategy because it plays into managements (and the NMB) position that PS is compensation. The idea that PS will never be as big a bargaining chip as it will be next week is real. If we squander that leverage we might as well lay the bet on if that's the case. And I've said that too in my letter to my reps.
As for the annuity, I know we're not getting a pension like C2K but I'd like to read our NC obtained a Annuity for EVERY pilot which might go so far as an additional 20K a year in retirement for a 30 year career. Maybe it runs out if you live to 90. So what? Its a good idea and it benefits ALL of us instead of just a few. I don't need it but it helps those who do.
PS is a big shiny box and its got an allure I give you that. But its a concession. Pure and simple. A concession we made to prevent a worse outcome. We need to fix that pronto.
Sorry, but the sarcasm was from reading your pithy response when you were asked a straight forward question.
Fair enough. I don't agree with you, but I see some of your points.
I disagree that PS will not be as big a bargaining chip as it will this year. I think it will be even bigger next year (for most); a higher % at least.
I think that's why we need to leave it alone until we're done with this PWA negotiation.
I'd also prefer to take it in a straight up pay increase. My number: 20% for openers and 15% minimum when the NC walks away from the table.