Originally Posted by
Coneydog
When Brownstreak voted in concessions, they knew they were doing it at the expense of another pilot group. Eagle tried to hold the line, and PSA undercut them. Wasn't the first time PSA has done this to another pilot group. That's the difference.
Really? Please tell us about the other times when PSA did something "at the expense of another pilot group". Please!
Get this, junior. PSA voted no to concessions in exchange for additional/new shiny jets
TWICE previously.
The first time they voted "no", those jets went to Mesa. The second time they voted "no", those jets went to Republic. The third time PSA pilots were offered new/additional aircraft it came with the caveat that if they voted "no" again,...... their little 49 airplane, 450 pilot operation
would be shut down. Clearly they, (AND A.L.P.A.!!!) believed it!
Sound familiar? "Vote no and jets go to another carrier", (like, say.... COMPASS!). "Vote no again and jets go to another carrier", (like,..... REPUBLIC!). "Vote no a third time and we'll shrink you to non-existence"?
So again, PLEASE tell us when, (in your mind), PSA pilots took advantage of a situation,......
"at the expense of another pilot group". PLEASE!