Originally Posted by
Flightcap
I've always wondered whether they thought they had a tailplane stall....... for which correct recovery is aft elevator, retract the flaps, power to a specified (not necessarily full) setting. Given the fact that tailplane stalls occur more readily with flaps extended, and that the stall occurred at the moment of flap extension, the "recovery" they tried to perform would have made sense. Obviously, it would have sense EXCEPT for the super low airspeed and stick shaker. There is no excuse for missing these cues. But I'm still curious what any Q drivers would think. Could the conditions of flight have suggested a tailplane stall?
This, again? Just read the report. We are all pilots, we can all read at a High School level or higher. Just read the report and all the ridiculous questions about 3407 will be answered:
Aviation Accident Report AAR-10-01