Originally Posted by
FL451
If you really are "out on the line" as you claim you should just enjoy your job and stop worrying about this crap. I'm not sure who or how you feel slighted by but wow move on. You act as if the Training Department is the SS.
I suspect you probably didn't make it here at AWAC, failed a checkride by showing up to CPT and/or sim planning on breezing through and got knocked on your can and now you spend your nights drinking alone, crying, in your parents basement and posting nonsense on APC about how someone else must be at fault because it couldn't be you.
Also stop referencing a court case about an event that happened 10 years ago that you know next to nothing about. I mean none of us are bringing up how ten years ago you wet your pants at recess because the little red haired girl said she was going to slap you. So move on.
If you choose to believe that I lied about being out on the line, there is nothing I could do about it. I cannot prove to you without revealing who I am and I dont need to prove anything to you.
The "article" is water down and you don't get the whole picture. Unless you choose to get a partial picture then that's your problem. The court document was what the jury heard, so that what I went by as to what happened before and after he "blew up".
If you can read, pitchtrim was the one who used the word "discriminate" first, NOT me. So if they can do it to one guy, what makes you think they cannot do it to other people at their leisure? If 10-year-old case is irrelvant, then why do we do case study of some accidents dating back 30years?
http://www.ntsb.gov/_layouts/ntsb.av...08FA018&akey=1
"The POI stated that he was not aware of the amount of time AWAC pilots needed to complete IOE, and that, if he had known, he would have been very concerned. He stated that if a lot of pilots were requiring a lot of IOE, it might indicate something wrong with the training."
The POI said that, NOT me!