Originally Posted by
aewanabe
"I would certainly hope the "value" they're talking about (which in this case seems like "cost" would be a better word, but I guess the company thinks "value" sounds better) would decrease, otherwise there's REALLY no point in building the lodge."
How else should we interpret this other than being okay with new hire compensation funding the lodge?
Why is wrong for me to hope that something the company does actually saves money? No where did I say that money should come out of the pocket of new hires.
I know it's not a popular opinion to think management might actually do something that makes sense in the long run and isn't specifically designed to screw pilots over.