Originally Posted by
DashTrash
I completely agree, but I believe that part of the criteria for a new airframe was going to be based on pax comments and considerations. At least, that was what was communicated. The reason most pax like the Airbus is because the cabin is roomier than the comparable Boeing product. That will not change for Boeing unless they change. Twin aisle configuration also allows another set of overhead bins so that less luggage has to be checked at the gate. Further reducing turn times. Part of the additional cost might be offset by creating more frequency, thereby more usage of each airframe.
I couldn't disagree more. When you search online for a ticket, it gives price and number of flights. Nowhere does it say Airbus, Boeing, Seat width, or seat pitch.
I love riding on a bus compared to any Boeing narrowbody, but at the end of the day, Airbus made a design and marketing F___ up. They gave everybody in back more room, but nobody pays for it. They should have made the tube narrower, lighter, etc. It costs the airplane weight, performance, cost, and fuel, for no additional revenue premium over a 75 or 73.
I am one of the very few who do choose to buy tickets based somewhat on comfort. For a short flight I don't care. For a longer flight I alway choose Airbus if I can. That includes a 330 over a 777, as most 777's are configured 10 across now internationally. It is really tight. 330's in the back are fantastic (340's too but there aren't a lot left).
I guarantee when Boeing builds a new narrow body, it won't be an inch wider than a 737.