Originally Posted by
BenderRodriguez
I recently talked to one of the fuel guys and he said Bakken crude was not economical. You might be right about the Brent being cheaper than WTI, and that would explain the tanker ship lease. And I agree with you on the Saudis. I really wish there was a way to make then drown in their own oil, but I guess the current market is as good as it's gonna get in that regard.
I don't mean to get in the middle of your debate, it's interesting and informative. But...............I thought Delta leased the tanker under the Jones Act (?) in order to ship (Bakken) crude between New Orleans and Trainor?
Denny