View Single Post
Old 03-30-2015 | 02:24 PM
  #64  
gloopy
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
Gloopy,

You might review "due process" in the 14th amendment and Art.I, Section 9, Clause 3 as to why that can't happen.

I am still waiting for a reason American carriers don't compete, IF the agreement allows for "beyond rights". Clearly there is a huge underserved market in India, Asia and Africa which is where EK got started. EY and QR are the ego fueled carriers who just took EK's lead.
GF
DL is trying to be as big a player in Africa as it can relative to the markets and security concerns there. DL was ran out of NYC-India by heavily dual subsidized "competition". DL is growing in Asia and has plans to continue for a long time.

There is no way the so called "open skies" we agreed to with ME3 was completely unlimited. That would be absolutely stupid for us to agree to, has never been agreed to with any nation ever, and in the unlikely event its ever allowed, we should immediately withdraw from it.

I agree that EY and QR are little emotional copy cats, but EK is very much EGO driven, especially with their scorched earth footprints and growth plans for the EU, US and Australia. The whole world isn't clamoring for hourly super jumbo service from every city in the world, including the US, to Dubai, Doha and Abu Dhabi.

And the Constitution is only as strong as the progressive that's reading it. Since its supposedly a "living document" subject to the whims of a changing vernacular and the social political zeitgeist, it should be no problem implimenting a carve out of the tax loophole for them. Worst case just make it apply to every expat from dollar one. It is used as a primary recruiting tool to come after American jobs. Fly for EK and don't pay US taxes. That is a primary form of their compensation for those considering working there.
Reply