Originally Posted by
Bananie
I guess. It just seems like the company could make the opposite argument that if profit sharing had no value our refusal to give it up would not harm the pilots unduly. I think we should come up with some other argument
I can only go by what you've written here, but I don't see a problem. If the company were to make the claim that pilots will not be unduly harmed by pilots refusing to give up profit sharing, I would say: "You're right. Pilots don't make proposals to harm themselves."
What am I missing here?
Carl