Originally Posted by
Nantonaku
Wait, I don't get it, what are you saying? It sounds like you two are arguing the same thing. Or are you saying the build up in SEA is only wide-bodies and there are no plans to grow SEA domestically??
To have a successful international route you have to feed it from both ends. Alaska was the plan for SEA. They chose a different direction. We will now feed it internally. It's not a shift in the business plan, it's executing the business plan. That means both narrow body and widebody growth in SEA. Delta's yields in SEA are second only to ATL system wide. So far there seems to be no issue of to much capacity there. I think Delta and Alaska can coexist there just fine!