View Single Post
Old 04-12-2015 | 01:20 PM
  #180708  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Carl Spackler
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Well first Carl I never said it was a Fom violation or that it happened at Delta. They most certainly did however suspend his ticket for 30 days.
OK, it wasn't an FOM violation. Then what was the FAA violation? What FAR says you have to be redispatched if you return to the gate for any reason? The FAA would never suspend someone's ticket for 30 days without an FAR violation to back it up.

Again, I think you've made the whole thing up. I have no idea why you do this.

Originally Posted by sailingfun
A friend from NW tells me they also required a new release if you returned to the gate.
Your friend was wrong.

Originally Posted by sailingfun
It's pretty standard at every airline and yes the FAA does require a 121 flight be released by dispatch.
Everyone knows a 121 flight needs to be released by dispatch sailingfun. We're talking about whether you need a re-release if you return to the gate for any reason or the FAA will suspend your ticket for 30 days as you've alleged.

You need to admit you exaggerated a story to make some strange point. There is no such FAR, and the FAA would never suspend your license for 30 days for an alleged FOM violation. Stop digging!

Carl