Originally Posted by
Klondike Bear
I was talking about UPS and pay banding. None of this has anything to do with us hiring 1000 guys/year.
Actually I guess it does and actually makes my point. If we had pay banding we would not need to hire as many as we are now. I don't have any idea how many less but it would be less.
Jerry used to make that argument too. But he never came up with any numbers to prove that it is the catastrophe that it is made out to be. I just can't get on board with it being a bad idea based on hyperbole. I don't believe for a second that it will affect hiring to any measurable degree. We are going to grow at something like 3%/year. If you couple that with the retirements, it's a skeeter on an elephant's butt.