Originally Posted by
Check Essential
Regarding what happened with C2012, I will quote Hillary. "At this point, what difference does it make?".
My only objective in posting about this is to urge caution and hope the reps keep the administration on a much shorter leash this time or the same thing could happen again. The reps could wake up one morning and read in the paper that the Delta pilots have a new contract.
Voting it down or sending it back for modifications is far more difficult after those headlines have run.
That's the lesson of C2012. Sorry if that offends some people.
What you are saying above is not offensive, what I found offensive is attacking your fellow pilots credibility simply because they don't have the same opinion as you do. You also mischaracterized what I was saying. (emphasis added)
Originally Posted by
Falcon7
I'm not spinning Carl, because I'm not asserting everything was done exactly by the book, nor am I asserting that it wasn't. IOW I'm not joining Karnak, nor am I buying your assertion of proof just because you say so.
Healthy skepticism is good, but that cuts both ways. One of the lessons of C2012, IMO, is to also be skeptical of the skeptics.