Originally Posted by
AllenAllert
I agree, this is why it's important that the MEC not allow the "Houston carve-out".
So they sell it as a retroactive, system-wide blanket policy going forward. Make it an LOA. It could be sold that way to the MEC. The reality is a grandfather policy, such as for two years, would likely only benefit the 200 737 CAs in IAH. So it would be a defacto carve out. But spin is spin. The company doesn't care as long as it costs them nothing.