Originally Posted by
DALMD88FO
[/COLOR]
If what people are saying is true, the rotations are going to be pulled so FO's can't even bid them, then you may want to educate the jr FO's on how this is going to mess with their QOL. Stuff rolls down hill. So the senior FO that used to bid MUC but can't now because of TOE's now bids his next most desirable and so on and so on. Those jr FO's now are scratching their heads asking themselves why they are flying really crummy trips when they held much better before the new system.
Which is exactly why we should not be arguing with each other over which "good deals" are worth protecting and which are not.
It's one thing for the company to want to tamp some of these out. It's a whole 'nother thing to see your neighbor getting a good deal and say "that's not cool. We should redistribute it to everyone."
With very few exceptions, I am not interested in giving up any of the good parts of our contract in order to level it out, or whatever some of you guys are talking about.
How about we keep what we have and work on making the rest better? It boggles my mind that anyone would want to make an argument to get rid of some of these items. Let management do that