View Single Post
Old 05-02-2015 | 01:10 PM
  #181842  
full of luv
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
Which is exactly why we should not be arguing with each other over which "good deals" are worth protecting and which are not.

It's one thing for the company to want to tamp some of these out. It's a whole 'nother thing to see your neighbor getting a good deal and say "that's not cool. We should redistribute it to everyone."

With very few exceptions, I am not interested in giving up any of the good parts of our contract in order to level it out, or whatever some of you guys are talking about.

How about we keep what we have and work on making the rest better? It boggles my mind that anyone would want to make an argument to get rid of some of these items. Let management do that
I guess I don't see alpa putting it in our sights. We are talking about what the company supposedly wants. Just like us they mostly get section 6 or bk court to address items they want changed in the contract. We've been discussing how to value that. It is negotiation at the end of the day. Just as an aside what do the other majors do?