Thread: 1509v
View Single Post
Old 05-03-2015 | 02:02 PM
  #126  
AllenAllert
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
Yes, except I am not sure it applied to the SEA 777. I agree with you, I could argue either way. Is this what Ben is asking for?
Not sure about the SFO/LAX 747 but the ORD 747 closing/opening would have effectively been a FLUSH without the LOA grandfather rights.

The Houston surplus is just that a surplus. A carve-out that gives SUPER SENIORITY is a bad precedence and violates the seniority of all United pilots.
Reply