Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine

Labor unions are similar to investment capitol. Shareholders pool their money together in order to get a greater return than they would if they were to take the same amount of money and start their own company. Labor unions pool their resources (the employees) together to negotiate a better compensation package than they could on their own.

You think the employees of a company that has a union should quit. The reverse argument is why not run a company in a way where a union is not needed. Or, if employees get a union, why not argue that the management should quit?