Originally Posted by
FlyZ
It seems like there's one little section of scope that was left out. Not sure they would be so malevolent as to do it on purpose, unless we are about to see a TA with MORE concessions in this area. Some hints:
- It's a certain aircraft size bigger than 50-seaters and smaller than Alaska
- We traded some doomed-to-fail 50-seaters for them in 2012
- The manufacturers start with C and E
Anyone?
I tried to attach the full report from which you presumably quoted, but it's too bid. You can find it on the DALPA website under Committees ==> Scope Analysis and Compliance. It goes through all of Section 1, including the current AF JV violation.