Originally Posted by
jsled
Ha. Go look at 8-E-7a and 8-E-7b. Different processes for displacements v "complete phase out". They are different and you know it. Your arguments sound like your SLI arguments...and we know how idiotic they proved to be. I suspect this stupid resolution will gain no traction with the MEC just as LCAL's arguments gained little traction with the arbitrators. Bring on da bumps. Look out below!!!
Thanks for pointing out more areas that the contract already deals with base closures. Again because if these the MOU was not needed. Do you need a picture? Maybe with crayons?
I do not disagree that the heavy weighted LUAL MEC will shoot this down. Only special carve outs are gives to LUAL types.