Originally Posted by
shiznit
A 14-5 vote is pretty indicative that the process was followed
Two completely different things and you know it. Some reps loved it, some hated it, some felt like they were put in a no-win situation by the negotiators signing the TA without redirection...and reluctantly voted YES. Voting your conscience based on what gets put in front of you does not equate to process being properly followed.
Saddam Hussein won his last election 100% to 0%. In the world of shiznit, that's pretty indicative that process was followed.
Originally Posted by
shiznit
(16-5 had the Company not closed MEM the month prior).
More BS. You have no idea how that vote would have gone.
Originally Posted by
shiznit
If the reps believed there was behavior that undermined their authority we would have had a 0-19 (0-21) result.
Why would they vote it down if they felt the result for their pilots would be worse given the awful position they'd been put in? The best indication of what the reps believed is the reps tossing the guilty within O'Malley's administration, and O'Malley being replaced. The best indication of one pilot base's judgment was tossing you from office and replacing you with a terrific young rep.
Carl