Originally Posted by
ECQLO
If you read the LOA under section D. STV for HKG and CDG. By passing this LOA you are giving a freehand to the Company to do this (granted it is temporary). If I'm not mistaken under the current contract (Prez jump in) this is not the case. One of our previous managers was notorious of throwing in our faces that we had a choice and we bid it. This is true. He also claim that the Company has never forced anyone to go to SFS (this I don't know). But I will say this much, if this LOA passes and they can't fill the seats it is the junior guys that will be inverse into it and I can definitely see this individual say "The union negotiated for it"
Why would anyone would agree to this.
I think I would listen to avi8torguy in regards to the present contract and the LOA. Trust me he is alot more qualified and knows a hell of alot. I think he is someone who should be listened to. He is not just your average line guy but someone who has been involved since ALPA came on the property 8 years ago. If he is who I think he is I can't believe he is wasting his time bantering with all of us. Just shows that our leadership really does give a $hit.