Originally Posted by
Flyguppy
You're about as thick as they come.
Your argument is flawed.
The contract covered the closing of a base. It did NOT cover the reopening of the exact same base a few months later. Hence the MOU.
As others have said, I would rather have seen seniority dictate the filling of the vacancies. In reality, pilots on that equip were so senior, they would have held it anyway.
This IAH proposal is not similar at all.
The contract covers the closing and opening of a base. The time period it was closed is irrelevant. Look at MOU 14, the same 24 months are given to the SEA pilots and that base has not been reopened. So your theory on it only applying to the reopening of a base is flawed.
I will leave out the personal attracts pertaining to yor intelligence.